The role of psychological safety, communication climate, and employee engagement in preventing formal industrial disputes

Authors

  • G.H.Nandish Research scholar, Specialization in Human Resources, School of Management, CMR university city campus Author
  • Dr Ismail Zabivullah.B Assistant Professor, Specialization in Management, School of Management, CMR university city campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66635/mgnfb585

Keywords:

Sustainable Entrepreneurship, SMEs in Emerging Economies, Psychological Safety, Employee Engagement, Organizational Sustainability

Abstract

This study examines how workplace-level organizational dynamics contribute to sustainable entrepreneurship and enterprise resilience in emerging economies, with specific focus on Indian manufacturing SMEs. Drawing on theories of psychological safety, employee engagement, and communication climate, the research explores how these internal factors influence the escalation of workplace grievances into formal industrial disputes and, in turn, affect long-term organizational sustainability. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, qualitative insights from interviews and focus groups with employees, supervisors, and union representatives informed the development of context-specific measures, which were subsequently tested through a survey of manufacturing employees. The findings reveal that psychological safety and a supportive communication climate significantly enhance employee engagement and reduce the likelihood of conflict escalation. Importantly, these workplace conditions foster trust, collaboration, and efficient conflict resolution, thereby strengthening firm-level stability, productivity, and sustainable growth. By positioning workplace climate as a strategic organizational capability, this study contributes to the literature on sustainable entrepreneurship by demonstrating how internal relational dynamics support resilience and value creation in SME contexts. The results also highlight the importance of inclusive and participatory management practices in shaping sustainable enterprise outcomes in Asia’s emerging economies. The study offers practical implications for entrepreneurs, managers, and policymakers seeking to promote sustainable, inclusive, and conflict-resilient business environments.

References

1.Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23-43.

2.Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human resource management review, 27(3), 521-535.

3.Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel psychology, 70(1), 113-165.

4.Kacholi, G., & Mahomed, O. H. (2020). Sustainability of quality improvement teams in selected regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(4), 259-265.

5.Men, L. R., & Yue, C. A. (2019). Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors. Public relations review, 45(3), 101764.

6.Jiang, Z. (2017). Proactive personality and career adaptability: The role of thriving at work. Journal of vocational behavior, 98, 85-97.

7.Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19-38.

8.Bulińska-Stangrecka, H., & Bagieńska, A. (2021). The role of employee relations in shaping job satisfaction as an element promoting positive mental health at work in the era of COVID-19. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 1903.

9.Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., Chang, H. S., & Li, J. J. (2020). Workplace spirituality as a mediator between ethical climate and workplace deviant behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102372.

10.Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & environment, 27(4), 328-346.

11.Lumpkin, G. T., Bacq, S., & Pidduck, R. J. (2018). Where change happens: Community‐level phenomena in social entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 24-50.

12.Wiklund, J., Nikolaev, B., Shir, N., Foo, M. D., & Bradley, S. (2019). Entrepreneurship and well-being: Past, present, and future. Journal of business venturing, 34(4), 579-588.

13.Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of management, 42(5), 1250-1281.

14.Abbas, G., Yasin, I. M., Wahab, S. A., & Qammar, A. (2025). Innovative safety moderation among workplace environment, workplace health, and employee sustainable performance: a holistic approach for SMEs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 3108-3139.

15.Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., & Santini, E. (2024). Sustainability and SMEs: Opening the black box. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(3), 413-420.

16.Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International journal of management reviews, 19(1), 31-53.

17.Karatepe, O. M., & Olugbade, O. A. (2016). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2350-2371.

18.George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 45(5), 999-1027.

19.Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of business venturing, 25(5), 439-448.

20.Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business strategy and the environment, 27(3), 300-322.

21.Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(1), 49-72.

22.Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small business economics, 56(2), 809-832.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

The role of psychological safety, communication climate, and employee engagement in preventing formal industrial disputes. (2026). Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 22(3s), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.66635/mgnfb585