EVOLVING TOWARD IMPACT: A THEMATIC SYNTHESIS AND CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF SUSTAINABILITY MATURITY IN BUSINESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/7bjd3g24Keywords:
Sustainability maturity, ESG, CSR, thematic analysis, business impactAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the changes in sustainability as a compliance-based corporate social responsibility (CSR) activity to a strategic, impact-focused strength. It aims to synthesise two decades of literature (2006-2026) on sustainability and business-impact maturity, integrating fragmented research across CSR, ESG, and digital transformation into a cohesive conceptual framework.
Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative thematic review of forty peer-reviewed Scopus-indexed articles was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase approach. R Studio was employed for co-occurrence mapping and thematic visualisation to identify key research clusters and maturity patterns, integrating insights from institutional, stakeholder, and dynamic capability theories to conceptualise sustainability maturity progression.
Findings: The review identifies four dominant themes shaping sustainability maturity: (1) technology-enabled business transformation, (2) policy, governance, and institutional alignment, (3) sustainability performance measurement and reporting, and (4) strategic integration and CSR. Together, these themes indicate a shift from operational enablers toward strategic integration and business impact. Building on these insights, the study proposes the Institutional–Stakeholder–Innovation Maturity Model (ISIMM), which frames sustainability maturity as a recursive process of sensing, seizing, and transforming capabilities.
Originality/value: The study presents a new integrative paradigm (ISIMM) where the conceptual models of maturity are connected to actual business outcomes. It contributes to the overall knowledge of the ways organisations can transition to the data-driven and impact-oriented approaches to sustainability, including a diagnostic framework and roadmap on how organisations can become more sustainable.
Practical implications: The findings offer actionable insights for business leaders, policymakers, and sustainability officers by linking sustainability initiatives to measurable performance outcomes and strategic competitiveness.
Future research directions: It is suggested to further empirically prove the ISIMM model in the industry and at the institutional level, with a specific focus on digital sustainability measures, ESG innovation, and longitudinal maturity.
References
1. Aleksin, G., & Dyba, O. (2024). Corporate governance under economic transformation and geopolitical uncertainty: Case of Ukraine. In Economic Transformations Under Uncertainty (pp. 125–138). https://doi.org/10.21303/978-9916-9850-6-9.ch9
2. Aytekin, I. (2021). Green human resource management and corporate social responsibility for a sustainable environment: A bibliometric review. In Contributions to Finance and Accounting (pp. 267–286). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72624-9_17
3. Babin, R., & Nicholson, B. (2011). How green is my outsourcer? Measuring sustainability in global IT outsourcing. Strategic Outsourcing, 4(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538291111108426
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Chen, G., Wang, J., & Kane, J. (2025). What is the impact of green credit on technical innovation in renewable energy? The policy-accommodating practices of businesses. Energy Strategy Reviews, 49, 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101665
6. Damaceno, E. R., Pinto, J. D. S., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Moraes, G. H. S. M. D., Leal Filho, W., & Anholon, R. (2025). Incorporating local communities into sustainability reporting: A grey systems-based analysis of Brazilian companies. AppliedMath, 5(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath5020042
7. Dang, V. A., Gao, N., & Yu, T. (2025). Environmental regulation and access to credit. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12848
8. De Chiara, A., & Russo Spena, T. (2011). CSR strategy in multinational firms: Focus on human resources, suppliers, and community. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561111128528
9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
10. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organisation & Environment, 29(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176
11. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2018). The Nordic model: An analysis of leading practices in ESG disclosure. Harvard Business School Press.
12. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
13. Finnerty, N., Sterling, R., Coakley, D., Contreras, S., Coffey, R., & Keane, M. M. (2017). Development of a global energy management system for non-energy-intensive multi-site industrial organisations: A methodology. Energy, 120, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.049
14. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
15. Glaveli, N., Alexiou, M., Maragos, A., Daskalopoulou, A., & Voulgari, V. (2023). Assessing the maturity of sustainable business model and strategy reporting under the CSRD shadow. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(10), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16100445
16. Haider, A. (2012). Creativity lies at the edges of chaos: Reducing complexity in IT projects. Conference Paper.
17. Hansen, J. D., & Xie, Z. (2025). Financial performance and ESG in the EU’s core: Effects of the Russian-Ukraine war and post-COVID recovery. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.18450
18. Hluszko, C., Barros, M. V., Martins de Souza, A. M. D., Ramos Huarachi, D. A., Castillo Ulloa, M. I., Moretti, V., Puglieri, F. N., & de Francisco, A. C. (2024). Sustainability in practice: Analysing environmental, social and governance practices in leading Latin American organisations' reports. Cleaner Production Letters, 4, 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100069
19. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013, Vol. 1).
20. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013, Vol. 2).
21. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013, Vol. 3).
22. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013, Vol. 5).
23. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013, Vol. 4).
24. Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3–4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004
25. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. (2023). Erratum regarding missing conflict of interest, funding and ethical statements in previously published articles – part 2 (Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), S2199853123001567).* https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100114
26. Kargbo, U., Terrence, B., & Palmer, T. B. (2025). Redefining corporate social responsibility: The role of strategic communication practices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(9), 4226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094226
27. Kohler, M., da Costa, P., Cluzel, F., & Umbricht, L. (2026). A review of corporate climate ratings: Assessing divergence from scientific expectations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 194, 116352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116352
28. Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
29. MacKie, D. (2023). The handbook of climate change leadership in organisations: Developing leadership for the age of sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003343011
30. Mao, J., Xie, J., Gao, Y., Tang, Q., Li, Z., & Zhang, B. (2024). Navigating growth: The nexus of supply chain finance, digital maturity, and financial health in Chinese A-share listed corporations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13), 5418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135418
31. Mazhar, M. U., Domingues, A. R., Yakar-Pritchard, G., Bull, R., & Ling, K. (2024). Reaching for net zero: The impact of an innovative university-led business support programme on carbon management strategy and practices of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3844
32. Meza-Ruiz, I. D., Rocha-Lona, L., del Rocío Soto-Flores, M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., & López-Torres, G. C. (2017). Measuring business sustainability maturity—Levels and best practices. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.176
33. Milligan, V., Gurran, N., Lawson, J., Phibbs, P., & Phillips, R. (2009). Innovation in affordable housing in Australia: Bringing policy and practice for not-for-profit housing organisations together. AHURI Final Report.
34. Nikolaev, M. A., Makhotaeva, M. Y., Malyshev, D. P., & Malyuk, V. I. (2017). Corporate strategy for enterprises of telecommunication services sector in Russia. Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085886
35. Nimer, K., AbuGhazaleh, N., Tahat, Y., & Hossain, M. (2025). Family business, ESG, and firm age in the GCC corporations: Building on the socioemotional wealth (SEW) model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050241
36. Ning, X., Yim, D., & Khuntia, J. (2021). Online sustainability reporting and firm performance: Lessons learned from text mining. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031069
37. Peng, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, Y. (2025). Urban sustainable development policy and corporate carbon emissions. Finance Research Letters, 66, 108506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108506
38. Tăchiciu, L., Fülöp, M. T., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Oncioiu, I., & Topor, D. I. (2020). Non-financial reporting and reputational risk in the Romanian financial sector. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 668–684. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/668
39. Talan, A., Tyagi, R. D., & Surampalli, R. Y. (2020). Social dimensions of sustainability. In Sustainability Science and Engineering (pp. 199–214). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119434016.ch9
40. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
41. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
42. Viaro, T. A., & Roehe Vaccaro, G. L. R. (2013). Exploring green IT and green IS: Insights from a case study in Brazil. Conference Paper.
43. Wang, J., Zhou, X., Ma, Y., & Choi, Y. (2025). Public data elements and enterprise digital transformation: A quasi-natural experiment based on open government data platforms for sustainable urban planning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(10), 4676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104676
44. Werner-Lewandowska, K., & Golinska-Dawson, P. (2021). Sustainable logistics management maturity: The theoretical assessment framework and empirical results from Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9), 5102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095102
45. Witek-Crabb, A. (2019). CSR maturity in Polish listed companies: A qualitative diagnosis based on a progression model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6), 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061736
46. Wu, N., Boonlua, S., & Peemanee, J. (2025). Financial shared service centres and corporate sustainability: Empirical evidence from ESG performance. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 23(5), 169. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-169
47. Yatskovskaya, E., Srai, J. S., & Kumar, M. (2018). Integrated supply network maturity model: Water scarcity perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030896
48. Yazici, H. J. (2020). An exploratory analysis of project management and corporate sustainability capabilities for organisational success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1093–1113. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2019-0207
49. Zabukovšek, U., Tominc, P., & Bobek, S. (2023). Business IT alignment impact on corporate sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16), 12519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612519
